Renovation of South Sudan’s national parliament building is already reported as a completed project by Eye Radio in one of its posts. As the shared photos on the radio’s Facebook page give South Sudanese social media users a sneak peek into the grandeur of it all, the first instinct of any patriot is celebration. However, a sobering truth looms soon after – the imperative for judicious use and meticulous maintenance to preserve this national treasure to reduce the frequent need for major yet costly renovations.
Under Eye Radio’s post, I lamented a recurring trend in a comment: the propensity to build magnificent structures only to neglect their upkeep, leading to premature deterioration and exorbitant renovation costs. This cycle of neglect must be broken, especially when it concerns a symbol as significant as our parliament.
Construction of any state-of-the-art edifices must be followed with matching stringent rules and protocols for use, alongside comprehensive awareness promotion and education. This also requires a matching budget. Yet, many of the esteemed legislators are likely unaware of financial implications of maintaining such a structure with a marvellous interior at least per South Sudan’s standards. Hence, ensuring they are well-informed and accountable in this regard cannot be overemphasised.
To cut the seemingly gordian knot, patriots can propose and demand that salary deductions which are specifically earmarked for periodic maintenance are introduced for Members of Parliament (MPs). One of their immediate sessions should legislate on the maintenance budget and such salary deductions. Directly involving MPs in the financial commitment required for the building’s upkeep will instill a sense of ownership and responsibility. After all, those who benefit from the privilege of occupying such an architectural marvel should also bear the burden of preserving it.
A second measure is to demand that the pressing need for basic education on the proper utilisation of modern amenities within the building is also addressed. There are obvious disparities in exposure and access among current MPs. While some may be well-versed in the nuances of parliamentary decorum and bourgeoise living, others may not. It therefore wouldn’t be unfair to consider that some representatives may lack familiarity with even the most rudimentary functions, such as modern toilet facilities and technological accessories in the building, among others. This underscores the urgency of comprehensive training programs to equip the MPs with the necessary skills to navigate and maintain their workspace effectively.
In pursuit of all the above, MPs must be implored that safeguarding the parliament building transcends individual or political affiliations. It is a duty they all must owe to the nation and future generations. Therefore, they shouldn’t just use it like poultry that walks in and out of a coop with the most significant activities as littering and noise making.
Ultimately, the MPs have an opportunity to redeem their collective image by considering the suggested proposals by any patriot. They can seize the moment for creating a legacy of responsible stewardship over a national symbol. Let their actions speak volumes about their commitment to building a brighter and sustainable future for South Sudan.
Koiti Emmily 